visibility line check1

that guy up there s my mental support, i refuse to delete him off here

gggggggggggggggggg

placeholder1

Sensational, generalizing, reactionary comments, may be written in an aggressive tone (including swearing). There might be inconsistencies between multiple comments. Includes bot responses

Mediator tier 1 (lower)
More rational than the previous tier yet still use emotional language and may rush to conclusions but have sources/evidence to back up their take

Mediator tier 2 (higher)
Constructive, even educational at times [comments]. Provides clear evidence, including нпр. links

Instead of commenting on what the posters are actually saying, im focusing on their writing style instead (thus the way the information is presented, not the information itself). Sort of like an attempt to idly analyze and breakdown into groups the ways in which ppl share their thoughts/feelings without shaming or any appeal to anything (activism)

Said groups are color coded/
highlighted with;

(the tiers are vaguely inspired by Freuds theory of personality)

(representing
id)

(representing ego)

(representing superego)

(heres our first yellow highlighted twe*t)

One (1) twit*er discourse and infographics

-all of this isnt to say that one [tier/style] is ultimately better than the other bc sometimes the best approach is to say “fuck u” and leave it at that

The idea behind the idle research was to amateur-ly [read as “completely incorrectly”] analyze random posts/accounts online with surface level psychology knowledge in mind. I ended up only using posts (tj. commets/twe*ts)

(this is here mostly as a sort of side note...)

(pretty sure this is a bot...)